Differently to stars and reviews that are by definition single shot
exercise by user (no new review of the same user also after a new release)
are Quality Check Reports done periodically by experts.
So they aren't static but can and do change over time.
The summary presents 4 distinct ratings:
Works - that's the goal to achieve
Doesn't Work
could happen by errors in code
could be caused by system changes
no -m- versions available anymore
community license expired
Function call blocked in IRIS Native API on server side
some external resource was lost
no ws.//echoserver.... anymore only wss://echo...
Python library version mismatch
Impossible to test
the package requires more resources then available or affordable
missing access rights (AI keys, ...)
missing external resources ( e.g. MTTQ, UDP, ...)
testing on external environments
GitHub repo vanished
No report at all
to fresh for the revie cycle
missing explanation of what to verify
obvious risk to waste effort
subject out of scope o the reviewer
Thank you for submitting the idea. The status has been changed to "Planned or In Progress".
This is not a commitment; plans are subject to change. Stay tuned!