Problem
Changes to productions (new DTLs, rules, adapters, timeouts, upgrades) are risky because test environments rarely mirror real traffic, partner quirks, or peak volumes.
Reproducing an incident or validating a partner change requires manual data gathering, custom scripts, and coordination, delaying delivery and increasing outage risk.
Proposal
Add a “Create Digital Twin” wizard in the Management Portal that clones an existing production into an isolated sandbox namespace and replays real traffic (anonymized) to validate changes before go‑live.
The studio uses AI to auto‑generate targeted test cases, predict risk and capacity impact, and highlight behavioral diffs between “current” and “candidate” configurations.
Customer value
Faster onboarding and safer releases; fewer production incidents; confident partner testing; clear audit trail for compliance.
Shortens days/weeks of manual UAT to hours, with measurable risk scoring and automated rollback guidance.
Key capabilities
One‑click clone
Copies Ens.Config.Production and Ens.Config.Item into a sandbox namespace.
Automatically stubs outbound Operations (switches to simulated endpoints or “Null” ops) to avoid touching partners.
Imports related classes/DTLs/BPL/RuleSets and compiles.
Data capture and replay
Sources: Message Bank, Ens.MessageHeader + body payloads, journals, and Visual Trace links.
Choose time window, message types, and rate: 1x, accelerated, or peak profile.
Maintains causality/correlation (SessionId, MessageBodyId, Sync responses).
PHI‑safe anonymization
Built‑in de‑identification transforms for HL7 (segment/field maps), FHIR (bulk deface via FHIRPath), JSON/XML (XPath/JSONPath rules).
Configurable tokenization so referential integrity across messages is preserved.
AI test authoring and risk scoring
Analyzes historical errors/timeouts and auto‑creates edge‑case messages.
Suggests mutation tests for fields with high defect history or schema drift.
Produces a Risk Score per change (DTL edit, rule tweak, timeout change) with top contributing factors.
Diff and impact analysis
Compares old vs new behavior at multiple levels:
Routing decisions (RuleSet outcomes)
DTL field‑level differences (added/removed/mutated values)
Operation call patterns, HTTP status mixes, latency distributions
Generates a human‑readable “Change Impact Report” and a machine‑readable JSON for CI/CD gates.
Capacity and SLA simulation
Predicts queue growth, CPU/IO hot spots, and p95 latency under projected volumes.
Recommends adapter settings (pool size, retry/backoff), index suggestions, and throttling strategy.
Release support
Exports a self‑contained zpm module with test corpus and replay scripts for CI.
Optional blue/green and canary assist: route X% of live traffic through the candidate flow and compare outcomes in real time (read‑only shadow mode).
Technical design (IRIS‑specific)
Namespace topology
DTN_ sandbox namespace with roles limited to read/write locally; no external credentials.
Production definition copied via Ens.Config.Production/Item APIs; operations swapped to DTN.MockOperation subclasses.
Replay engine
DTN.Replay.Service reads Message Bank/Ens.MessageBody by ts range; drives messages through the cloned Production preserving sequence and sync semantics.
Uses EnsLib.* adapters in loopback or embedded mocks; generates canned responses from recorded traces when needed.
Anonymization
DTN.Deidentify.DTLs for HL7/FHIR/JSON with pluggable lookup/token services (HS.* libraries where available).
Policy stored in DTN.Security.Policy; enforced on import and before replay.
Diff engine
DTN.Diff.Router compares RuleLog; DTN.Diff.DTL walks source/target objects and produces field‑level deltas with severity tags.
Results persisted in DTN.Results.* tables; exposed via SQL views for dashboards.
AI integration
Embedded Python for test generation and risk scoring (scikit‑learn/xgboost) or IntegratedML models over DTN.Results.Aggregates.
LLM-powered explanations that cite exact rules/DTL nodes and link to source.
Portal UX
New action: Interoperability > Productions > “Create Digital Twin”
Wizard steps: Select production and time window -> choose anonymization policy -> select changes to test (new DTL, rule file, parameters) -> run replay -> view Impact Report.
Dashboards: Diff Summary, Risk Score, Capacity Forecast, and “Open in Visual Trace” deep links for any anomaly.
Security and governance
Never reuses production credentials; outbound endpoints are mocked by default.
All PHI handling is policy‑driven with audit logs of every sample and transform.
Role‑based access; approvals required to export artifacts or enable shadow traffic.
MVP acceptance criteria
Clone a production into a sandbox namespace; swap outbound Operations to mocks.
Import messages from Message Bank for a selected window; apply de‑identification.
Execute replay and show:
Routing decision diffs
Field‑level DTL diffs for at least one message type
Latency and queue forecasts under 1x and 3x volume
Generate an Impact Report and export a zpm bundle with test data and replay job.
Performance: replay 10k messages in <10 minutes on a standard dev box.
Example scenarios
Validate a new HL7→FHIR DTL before a payer go‑live; catch unexpected PID/OBX mapping changes and propose fixes.
Reproduce a weekend outage using last week’s traffic and confirm that a timeout + retry policy prevents reoccurrence.
Capacity plan for a new site onboarding by simulating 2x traffic with current hardware.
Success metrics
70% reduction in UAT cycle time for interface changes.
50% fewer post‑release defects tied to mapping/routing.
Documented audit packages produced automatically for every release.
Thank you for submitting the idea. The status has been changed to "Needs review".
Stay tuned!